LECTURE:
This week's Lecture was based on the topic of "
Evaluation and Authentication" of a Website. The lecturer introduced us with some pointer that indicates "information quality". Information
quality is usual described as data in which can be "Fit-For-Use". By Fit-for-use, i mean that the data has to be
reasonably suitable for another user and must not possess
sufficiency for other users.
The Lecturer then describes some facts about the WWW, such as the WWW has no management over who publishes on the Web, why publishers publish on the Web and what is published on the Web. Further on the
History of the WWW was displayed and roughly discussed about. I found the information provided so far a bit boring, not that it
wasn't useful, its just that I already knew the facts and contexts of the WWW from week Seven's Readings.
On the Contrary, when the lecturer started to talk about How to
evaluate the IQ on the WWW, I was very intrigued and satisfied with the information that was given. Different suggestions of different types of criteria to
examin Web were provided. Criteria such as Accuracy, Authority, Objectivity, Currency, Coverage and
Authentication. I Found this part of the lecture very beneficial as i learnt about:
*Authority*
When viewing a web page to seek information, it is important to know the quality of the
text before believing what has been stated.
You should consider....
- Who is the author of this web page?
- re the writers qualifications displayed on the web page?
- Do these qualifications give the author authority to write about what they have on the website?
- Does the author have any contact details displayed on the web page? (for example phone number, email or post address)
- Is there a reference list provided on the web page?
- Are there any sponsors for this web page?
*Objectivity*
Objectivity is defined as information which is without bias or prejudice and attempts to present all sides of an issue. It is essential for a viewer to distinguish between information that contains bias or opinionated data and information that is more factual and reasonable data.
You should identify...
- If the message show minimal bias?
- Is the page created in a way that shows opinionative information
- Is there any advertising on the page
- If the author include a page revealing who they are, what their purpose or philosophy is.
*Currency*
Data can be considered current if the Web page is clearly and continuously dated.
It is essential to ask yourself...
- Does the site provide you with a date?
- Is the information given up to date?
- Does the site provide you with information on its last update?Does the website contain current links which lead to current and existing pages?
*Coverage*
Web Coverage can differ print coverage, sometimes information is hosted for silliness or for no good purpose at all.
You should recognise...
- If the page required a specific software to view it?
- If the Image and text is balanced?
- If it is FREE or If any FEE is required?
- Information presented cited correctly?
*Authentication*
Authentication refers to the trustworthiness of the information provided by the Web page.If there is no trust between the user and the author, than obviously the Web page is not worth examining further.
Therefore in order to trust the text, you need to....
- consider where it is (domain type)
- Who wrote it (Name, Credentials)
- Put more consideration and examination effort into your findings (check for references)
These Evaluating and Authenticating strategies have opened my eyes to such obvious spoofs that many web pages have. Most of us just type in anything into "Google" and spontaneously believe what shows up on the screen, however, now I know exactly what to do, in order to determine if a Website is Legit or not.
WORKSHOP:
This week's workshop had me evaluating web pages and examining for their authentication as well as summary of the strategies of researching.When using the web as research tool we must be careful. By using these strategies we can get the right information on the right topic. Make sure you are looking at the right place since the web is a massive information based system any information can placed in the web. Almost everyone can use the web, read research materials and look for ambiguity, manipulative reasoning, and bias. Examine assumptions, including and perhaps especially, your own.
Try to find out who wrote the source, such as the name of the author or the agency and find some indications to prove they are a good author. Try to identify why the web page was created and it's reason probably to persuade you or sell something. Look for internal clues such as spelling and grammar also take note of the depth of material covered. See if any data or statistics are placed and are actual data not made up ones.
The next activity was evaluating two sites:
The link from American Cultural History: 1960 - 1969
The website was plain and had no design but the research material covered was in depth as it talked about the cultural history of America in the 60's, such as fashion, lifestyle, sport etc. Each material covered were reference from books. This web page was probably made to show the reader of how people lived in the 60's.

The link from the Almost Great Society: The 1960's
Although the website had a design to kook like a notebook, the research material covered were in depth but showed no evidence of reference or where the author obtain the information the only thing he referenced were pictures. Although it looks accurate the material might be made up since no real evidence shows such as reference. The purpose of this was probably to show someone the about the history of the Civil War in America.

READING:
This week required no reading to be published.